The BSA A7 & A10 Forum
24.05. 2012 20:00 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Best Picture poll still open for votes
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Amal 276 or 376 for A 10 plunger '54  (Read 657 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
edsdad
Active
*

Karma: 0
Posts: 5


« on: 11.07. 2011 16:47 »

Hello,
Please bear with I'm a complete novice and newby to this retoration lark. Need carb for my A 10. Do I need a 276 or 376? I've found a 376 on ebay with a starting bid of 99p so this is should/may go for less than the £160 or so for a new one from Amal. So, will a used 376 be a good buy if it's going for a song? Would a 376 do the job? (I have done a bit of reading on previous threads but my head now hurts). Oh, and does it have to be an Amal? Are there any other options?
On the plus side the VFR 400 just had a flat battery, so once the collar bone is fixed I'll be able to ride again!
Many thanks,

Dale.
Logged
a10gf
West Coast, Norway
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 11
Posts: 1099



WWW
« Reply #1 on: 11.07. 2011 18:06 »

I'd think a 376 is the correct type from 54' (and the better carb), but the 276 will work fine, and looks good (vintage) with the external float. (edit:as stated in posts below, 276 for all plungers according to Bacon books).

Whichever you go for, find one in decent shape (flooding, leaks, worn slides, wrong\worn jets, bent flanges at head intake) and don't forget to get the right diameter\type for the bike. Evaluate if a brand new one could turn out to be the better deal (and less trouble).

(edit 2: used a 376 for a period, tight fit but no problems, bellmouth. Clearly the better carb, much better float system and overall behavior, but reverted to 276 for the looks (and the leaks :O)

e
Logged

A10 GF '53, Triumph 900 Legend, Yamaha XT500
Norway - Bergen
beezalex
North Carolina, USA
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 3
Posts: 376



« Reply #2 on: 11.07. 2011 19:55 »

Plungers always came with 276 carbs.  Swingarm models started using Monoblocs in '55 according to the parts books.
Logged

Alex

Too many BSA's

trevinoz
Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia.
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 25
Posts: 1441



« Reply #3 on: 11.07. 2011 23:36 »

I agree with Alex.
   
     Trev.
Logged

Brian
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 14
Posts: 1070


Mt Gambier, South Australia.


« Reply #4 on: 12.07. 2011 01:05 »

Dale a 276 is the correct carby for your bike but you can use a 376 if you want to. There are a couple of things to be aware of if you do use a 376 however. The 376 is a taller carby than a 276 and it causes problems with the cables exiting the top of the carby. You cant have adjusters at the top of the carby, you have ferrules in the top and even with them the cables come out at a very sharp angle.

Are you aiming for originality ? if so then you need a 276. If not then you could use a 376 or even a concentric. Whatever you go for make sure it is a good serviceable unit, most of the ones on evil bay are worn out. Depending on your budget either a new monobloc or concentric, neither are horribly expensive.
Logged

beezalex
North Carolina, USA
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 3
Posts: 376



« Reply #5 on: 12.07. 2011 17:42 »

Also, fitting an air cleaner or even a velocity stack is damned near impossible with a mono or concentric carb.  You're pretty much stuck with the orginal setup if you're lucky enough to still have the stock airbox.
Logged

Alex

Too many BSA's

edsdad
Active
*

Karma: 0
Posts: 5


« Reply #6 on: 13.07. 2011 17:00 »

Thanks Gentlemen. It looks like a 276 then. New. Don't tell the wife.

Dale.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!