The BSA A7 & A10 Forum
08.02. 2012 13:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Monobloc or Concentric?  (Read 1150 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hubie
Dave Huybens
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 1
Posts: 335



« on: 20.03. 2010 23:18 »

Thought I would pose a question as I have one of each.  Do you think a monobloc is better than a mk 1 concentric?  I have a monobloc on my super meteor and a mk1 concentric on my golden flash.  It is supposed to have a monobloc on it and I was thinking of going back to original.  It is the only non original thing on the bike save for the indicators.

Cheers

Hubie.
Logged

1955 BSA Golden Flash
1956 Royal Enfield Super Meteor
1981 Suzuki GSX 250

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse get's the cheese!
trevinoz
Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia.
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 22
Posts: 1357



« Reply #1 on: 21.03. 2010 06:55 »

It is the only non original thing on the bike save for the indicators.

That is a rash statement, Hubie!
   

Carby wise, I always use the original type. Keeps the rivet counters happy.
Trev.
Logged

Triton Thrasher
Scotland
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 4
Posts: 305


« Reply #2 on: 21.03. 2010 07:59 »

I don't think you'll notice a difference between Monobloc and Concentric if both are in tune.
Logged

LJ.
Peterborough UK.
Global Moderator
Forum Oracle
*

Karma: 10
Posts: 1199


The Red A10!


WWW
« Reply #3 on: 21.03. 2010 19:16 »

Probably as Thrasher says.... But I think the Monobloc is a better looking carb. Never had any problems with mine, dunno why people go for the Concentrics...
Logged

Ride Safely Lads! LJ.
**********************
1940 BSA M20 500cc Girder/Rigid- In Bits!
1947 BSA M21 600cc Girder/Rigid-Green
1949 BSA A7   500cc Girder/Plunger Star Twin-Black
1953 BSA B33  500cc Teles/Plunger-Maroon
1961 BSA A10  650cc Golden Flash-Blue
1961 BSA A10  650cc Golden Flash-Red
MG
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 20
Posts: 901



« Reply #4 on: 21.03. 2010 19:35 »

Quote
dunno why people go for the Concentrics...

cause they are cheaper in case you have to buy a new one   smile
Logged

1955 A7 Shooting Star
1956 A10 Golden Flash
1961 Matchless G12 CSR

"Upon seeing the shadow of a pigeon, one must resist the urge to look up." (Confucius)

Austria
Triton Thrasher
Scotland
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 4
Posts: 305


« Reply #5 on: 22.03. 2010 13:54 »


Triton Thrasher, thats a bit like saying there will be no difference between the performance of a 1970 escort and a 1980 escort,

No it's not.  Those cars don't even weigh the same.

I believe either carb, if in tune, will be satisfactory to the chap who asked the question. I have not found Monoblocs to be noticeably better or worse than Concentrics.

I would say, if the bike is running well on a Concentric, time spent tuning a Monobloc might be considered wasted time.

Which features of the Mk 1 Concentric do you believe give it the superior performance?
Logged

bsa- bill
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 19
Posts: 1675



« Reply #6 on: 22.03. 2010 23:01 »

Richard I use Firefox it has a  spell checker and works just fine here.

All the best - Bill
Logged

All the best - Bill
a10gf
West Coast, Norway
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 11
Posts: 1040



« Reply #7 on: 23.03. 2010 00:38 »

Offtopic: (these comments refer to a post that was removed) Yes, the Firefox spellchecker is 1st class.
See these tips on how to safeguard any online writings.
Logged

A10 GF '53, Triumph 900 Legend, Yamaha XT500
Norway
Triton Thrasher
Scotland
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 4
Posts: 305


« Reply #8 on: 23.03. 2010 08:44 »

Just 45 years riding bikes no other evidence to support my comments
I prefer mikuni's
Richard
sorry but had a long reply typed but lost it oh how i wish this had a spell checker so I would not have to copy and paste

We're too nice to say anything about your spelling!

The plural of Mikuni has no apostrophe though.
Logged

beezalex
North Carolina, USA
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 3
Posts: 375



« Reply #9 on: 23.03. 2010 15:33 »

It depends on what you want.  Both have their pluses and minuses:

Construction quality: Monoblocs seem to not wear their slides out as rapidly and are not distorted at the flange quite as easily as Concentrics.

Sleeving: Monoblocs are more difficult to sleeve and I have found that the slide cutaway has to be modified after sleeving as for some reason they run richer on the slide.

Idle circuit:  All but the early concentrics have a pressed-in pilot jet which is closer to the spray holes and thus seems to have better response and is not as suceptible to flat spots off idle.  The downside is that this pilot clogs much easier and is much harder to clean out on concentrics.

Float chamber:  Monoblocs sometimes idle eratically or have difficulty starting on a sidestand due to the offset float bowl.  This usually can be cured by enriching or leaning out the idle when upright but it's a compromise.  Concentrics are unaffected by lean.  BTW, claims that monoblocs will change mixture in turns due to the offset bowl are vastly exaggerated.  Unless you ride like rossi, the balance of cornering and gravitational forces pretty much keeps the float level constant.

Flow:  Monoblocs are smooth-bore carbs and will actually flow more for the same bore size than a concentric.  Whether this translates into more performance depends on how well your head flows.
Logged

Alex

Too many BSA's

Richard
Guest
« Reply #10 on: 23.03. 2010 17:08 »


We're too nice to say anything about your spelling!

TT I always knew that!

The plural of Mikuni has no apostrophe though.
[/quote]

Whats a plural?
 doh
Alex you all know I chuck the A10 around worse than Rossi"
All I can say is that years ago we always fitted the concentrics in preference to the monobloc, perhaps we were just misguided youths
Richard
Logged
Triton Thrasher
Scotland
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 4
Posts: 305


« Reply #11 on: 23.03. 2010 22:01 »

There was a while when the only available replacement carb for Brit bikes was the Concentric.
Logged

Hubie
Dave Huybens
A-Clairvoyant
****

Karma: 1
Posts: 335



« Reply #12 on: 24.03. 2010 10:23 »

Continuing with the off topic, its very refreshing to see people concerned with correct spelling and grammar!  You should see some of the sites here in Australia!  just check the netrider forum for example!!

As far as the carb question I posed goes, I was just thinking along the lines of originality.

Cheers,

Hubie.
Logged

1955 BSA Golden Flash
1956 Royal Enfield Super Meteor
1981 Suzuki GSX 250

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse get's the cheese!
trevinoz
Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia.
Forum Oracle
*****

Karma: 22
Posts: 1357



« Reply #13 on: 24.03. 2010 23:03 »

I read an article which compared the 1966 Norton Atlas which had two Monoblocs, a LH and RH, and magneto with a 1967 model which had two Concentrics and coil ignition.
The 1966 model out-performed the '67.
Trev.
Logged

RGS man
Perth, Western Australia
Active
*

Karma: 0
Posts: 32


« Reply #14 on: 31.03. 2010 02:25 »

I have just bought a new 389 monoblock for my RGS, I guess it would be great if I could ride it!!!
I still have no front hub, therefore no front wheel. wth regard grammer, I live in Aus, I dont thing they even teach it here!!!
Cheers  Mark
Logged

1963 RGS
1970 Commando Fastbck
1973 Cb750/4
2009 Yamaha XJR 1300
2002 GSXR 600
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!